Best Korean Mineral Sunscreen: Six Picks, Checked Listing by Listing

Affiliate links below, but they cost you nothing extra. We only point you to what the ingredient lists actually back up.

Here’s a shortcut nobody hands you when you go looking for the best korean mineral sunscreen: the question has a legal answer in Korea, and it’s a very short one. Two ingredients. That’s the whole pass list. What makes it hard in practice is that the ingredient database everyone checks doesn’t sort by that list, so a botanical extract can show up under a heading called Sunscreen and zinc oxide can appear with a colour code attached to its name. So we opened 43 pages on INCIDecoder on July 29, 2026, counted every list by hand, and checked each product against the regulator’s list rather than the database’s heading.

Korea’s rule names 32 UV filters, and only two of them are minerals

Start with the document, because it settles the definition before any product comes into it.

Korean sunscreens are governed by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety regulation on cosmetic safety standards, which applies to every cosmetic manufactured, imported or distributed in Korea. Article 4 sends you to Annex 2 for ingredients that need use restrictions, then closes the door: preservatives, UV filters and the like that are not in Annex 2 may not be used.^[1] So the list isn’t a suggestion of common filters. It’s the set.

Annex 2’s UV filter table runs to 32 ingredient names. Thirty are carbon-based. Two are not: 징크옥사이드, zinc oxide, at a limit of 25%, and 티타늄디옥사이드, titanium dioxide, also 25%.^[1] Korean writeups call the mineral type 무기자차 and the carbon-based type 유기자차, and if the naming of those two categories is what brought you here, our breakdown of organic versus inorganic takes the words apart properly. This article assumes you already know which bucket you want and just wants to hand you the bottles.

Two things follow that matter for reading any label:

• A mineral claim is checkable in seconds. Find the UV filters on the list. If they’re only zinc oxide, only titanium dioxide, or both, it’s mineral. If anything else on the 32 is in there too, it’s a hybrid rather than a mineral formula.
• The 25% cap applies to both minerals equally. So “mineral” tells you which filter is doing the work, not how much protection you bought. A number on the front does that, and reapplication does more.

Why did six sunscreens take 21 database pages to check?

Because one search gives you one answer and there’s usually more than one. Two rules did the work here, and both are worth stating because every number below depends on them.

Which listings we counted. For each product we ran five or six different forms of its name through INCIDecoder’s search and pooled the results, then opened every entry whose title names that product. Titles that differ only by an SPF marking, a year, or Sun Cream against Sunscreen count as the same product. Three kinds get left out: a different product in the same line, an export version sold under a different product name, and entries filed under a reseller’s brand. One entry with the brand name misspelled as Instree does get counted, because a typo isn’t a reseller.^[4] Every exclusion is named and linked in the footnotes.

How we counted filters. Only ingredients on Korea’s list of 32. That isn’t the same as counting whatever a page files under its own Sunscreen heading, and the gap is not a database bug. INCIDecoder prints CosIng data, the EU’s ingredient inventory, and CosIng records Buddleja Officinalis Flower Extract with the function “uv filter”.^[2] A recorded function is a description of what an ingredient is said to do. It isn’t permission to sell it as a filter, and Buddleja is not among Korea’s 32. The same inventory pushes the other way for the minerals: zinc oxide’s functions include cosmetic colorant, and its formal name is printed as Zinc Oxide (Ci 77947), which is why you’ll see that colour code sitting next to it on real listings.^[2] Titanium dioxide carries Ci 77891 the same way.

Here’s how badly a single search can undercount. Searching Round Lab’s birch line one way returns one Mild-up entry. Adding a second phrasing returns four.^[7] For Dr.G, one query returns two entries and the pooled set returns thirteen, of which seven name the sunscreen itself.^[6]

And the clearest case for reading past the title is Benton. Two entries sit under near-identical titles: Benton Mineral Sun Cream Spf50+/Pa++++ at 38 ingredients with zinc oxide third and titanium dioxide fourth, and Benton Mineral Sun Cream SPF 50+ Pa++++ at 35 with zinc oxide second and no titanium at all.^[5] They’re two different sunscreens. The second one’s own web address says skin-fit, which its title drops. Both are mineral, so nothing is being hidden from you, but if you were matching a box to a page by title you’d have picked the wrong one about half the time.

The best Korean mineral sunscreen picks, fewest listings first

Ordered by how many database entries I had to open to be sure. That ordering is doing real work: fewer entries means fewer chances for two pages to disagree with each other.

Sunscreen	Listings opened	Ingredients per listing	Mineral filters on Korea’s list	Titanium dioxide
AESTURA Derma UV365 Barrier Hydro Mineral	2	26, 26	zinc oxide, second on both	no
Benton Skin Fit Mineral Sun Cream	2	35, 35	zinc oxide, second on both	no
Goodal Heartleaf Calming Mineral Filter Sun Cream	2	57, 41	zinc oxide, second and first	no
Isntree Hyaluronic Acid Natural Sun Cream	4	25, 26, 30, 39	zinc oxide on all four	no
ROUND LAB Birch Juice Moisturizing Mild-up Sun Cream	4	35, 35, 35, 32	zinc oxide, second on all four	no
Dr.G Green Mild Up Sun+	7	28, 32, 36, 36, 40, 52, 53	varies, see below	on 2 of 7

AESTURA Derma UV365 Barrier Hydro Mineral

The cleanest record of the six. Two entries, 26 ingredients each, zinc oxide second on both and nothing else the regulator would call a filter.^[3] A third entry titled only Aestura Sunscreen also runs to 26 with zinc oxide second, and it stays out. That call isn’t new here, and I’d rather say so than let one decision look like two: our alcohol-free roundup reached the same entry first and set the rule, which is that a page that never names the product can’t stand in for it.^[3] Our full review of this one reads the same entry and covers the cast question. Note that the brand’s Red Calming Tone-Up shares the Derma UV365 name and is a hybrid with six filters, so the line name alone won’t tell you which you’re holding.^[3] The link goes to the 25ml mini, which is the smallest of the sizes it sells in: current price here.

Benton Skin Fit Mineral Sun Cream

Two entries, 35 ingredients each, zinc oxide second on both, and the first eight positions read the same on both pages.^[5] This is the product on the wrong side of the title collision described above, so match the ingredient count on your box before you trust a page: 35 is this one, 38 is the sibling with titanium dioxide in it. Both entries carry the alcohol-free tag and neither carries a fragrance-free tag, which is a separate question from filters and one we took apart in our piece on what those tags cover. See it on YesStyle.

Goodal Heartleaf Calming Mineral Filter Sun Cream

Two entries carrying the identical title, and they disagree by sixteen ingredients: 57 against 41.^[8] Zinc oxide is the only filter on both, second on the long one and first on the short one, so the mineral answer holds either way. The count doesn’t, and that gap is the reason to trust your own box over either page. At 57 this is the longest single listing here, and even its 41-item version is longer than any listing for the AESTURA, Benton, Isntree or Round Lab, which is worth knowing if a short list is part of what you’re shopping for. Check availability.

Isntree Hyaluronic Acid Natural Sun Cream

Four entries at 25, 26, 30 and 39 ingredients, zinc oxide the only filter on all four.^[4] Two details you won’t find on the others. The 30-ingredient entry writes the filter as Zinc Oxide (Nano), the only entry in this whole roundup that says anything about particle size, and if that word changes your decision, read our guide to what nano and non-nano actually certify before it does. The 39-ingredient entry, labelled a 2025 renewal, prints zinc oxide twice, at 33 and again at 38, and prints one silicone twice as well.^[4] A duplicated row is a transcription artefact rather than a second dose, and it’s a good reminder that a raw count includes whatever the page repeated. Price and stock here.

ROUND LAB Birch Juice Moisturizing Mild-up Sun Cream

Four entries, three at 35 ingredients and one at 32, zinc oxide second on every one of them.^[7] The 32-ingredient entry is the version titled for export, marked Broad Spectrum, and it’s zinc-only too, though export formulas follow a different regulator’s list than the one quoted above. The thing to be careful about is the brand’s own shelf. Round Lab’s Birch Juice Moisturizing Sunscreen, one word away, is a carbon-filter formula with no mineral in it at all, and that’s the one our birch juice review covers.^[7] The retailer calls the mineral one Mild Up Sunscreen while the database calls it Mild-up Sun Cream, so you’re matching three slightly different names for one tube. Where to buy it.

Dr.G’s seven listings do not agree on what is in the tube

The sixth pick earns its place on one test and fails to settle almost everything else, so here’s the disagreement in full rather than a tidy summary.^[6]

Entry	Ingredients	What the page files under Sunscreen	Filters on Korea’s list
Sun+ Spf 50+, Pa++++	28	Zinc Oxide 3, Buddleja 26	1
Sun+	32	Buddleja 29 only	0
Dr.g Sun+ SPF50+ Pa++++	36	Zinc Oxide 2, Buddleja 33	1
Sun	36	Zinc Oxide 2, Buddleja 33	1
Sun+ SPF 50+ Pa++++ (2021)	40	Zinc Oxide 2, Buddleja 39	1
SUN SPF50+ PA++++	52	Zinc Oxide 3, Titanium Dioxide 5	2
Sun Spf50+ Pa++++	53	Zinc Oxide 3, Titanium Dioxide (Ci77891) 5	2

Read the last two columns together and you can see both of this article’s problems in one product. Five entries file Buddleja Officinalis Flower Extract under Sunscreen, which is CosIng’s function record rather than a Korean filter approval.^[2] On four of those five, the stricter count is one filter and not two. The fifth, the 32-ingredient entry, has no zinc oxide row at all, so counting Buddleja there would turn none into one, and what you’re really looking at is a page missing a filter rather than a sunscreen without one. And the two longest entries add titanium dioxide, with the 53-item one printing it under its colour code. So the honest statement is narrow: no entry for this product carries a carbon-based filter, and that’s what makes it mineral. Which mineral, and how many, changes with the entry you open. What passes for settled here is what our review of this sunscreen reads, the 36-ingredient entry, where zinc oxide is the only filter on Korea’s list.

Check the current price. That link opens the size the retailer labels Jumbo, so look at the volume before you order.

Which lookalikes did I have to separate out, and how?

Four patterns, and the first three are name problems rather than chemistry problems.

• One word apart, opposite answers. Klairs sells All-day Airy Mineral Sunscreen, 33 ingredients with zinc oxide second and nothing else on the list, and also All Day Airy Sunscreen, 44 ingredients with four carbon-based filters and no mineral at all.^[9] Same brand, same two words on the front. The mineral one passes the same test the six above passed; it sits here rather than in that list because the pair teaches more than one more pick would. Round Lab’s birch pair and Benton’s two creams split the same way.
• The line name carries over, the filters don’t. AESTURA’s Red Calming Tone-Up carries the Derma UV365 name and has six filters, including homosalate and ethylhexyl salicylate alongside titanium dioxide.^[3] Dr.G’s Green Mild Up Sun Essence carries the Green Mild Up name and lists five carbon-based filters.^[6] Neither is mineral, and the shared line name is the only thing that would suggest otherwise.
• A format change can change the filter. Benton’s Mineral Sun Stick has two entries at 39 ingredients each. One lists titanium dioxide alone. The other lists titanium dioxide plus 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, which is on Korea’s list at a 4% limit and is very much carbon-based.^[5] Two entries, two different answers to the only question this article asks.
• Mineral on the list, missing from the shop. Two products passed the ingredient test and then had no live single-unit retail page I could send you to, so they’re not picks: Illiyoon’s Mineral Sun Cream, 35 ingredients with zinc oxide third and titanium dioxide sixth, and Etude House’s Sunprise Mild Airy Finish, two entries at 34 ingredients with zinc oxide second.^[10] The lists are worth having if you find them locally.

For the opposite end of the spectrum, a popular Korean sunscreen with no mineral component whatsoever, our COSRX Ultra-Light Invisible review reads a 28-ingredient list with four carbon-based filters and neither mineral anywhere on it.

What does a mineral filter actually buy me here?

One specific thing for one named group, and less than the shelf implies for everyone else.

The American Academy of Dermatology draws the category line exactly where Korea’s list does, then says who it’s for: “If the active ingredient in your sunscreen is titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, or both, you have a physical sunscreen. Dermatologists recommend physical sunscreens, also called mineral sunscreens, for people with sensitive skin.”^[11] Keep those two sentences together, because the second one comes with a group written into it. It isn’t a ruling that mineral beats chemical, and the AAD closes off that reading a few lines later: whichever type you’re holding, “any of these sunscreens can effectively protect you from the sun if you select one that is broad spectrum, water resistant, and has an SPF 30 or higher,” and “the best type of sunscreen is the one you will use again and again.”^[11]

So the reason to be on this page is a fit rather than an upgrade. Sensitive skin is the group the AAD names. Every pick above lists one mineral filter, or two on the longest pair of Dr.G entries, against the two to six that the carbon-filter sunscreens named in this article carry, and fewer filters meaning fewer things to react to is the argument our AESTURA review makes at more length. Outside that group, nothing quoted here says you should switch.

What the Korean regulation adds is that mineral tells you identity, not strength. Both minerals share the same 25% ceiling, and 30 carbon-based ingredients sit in the same annex with limits of their own.^[1] Being on the list is what they all have in common. We took the two words apart in our organic versus inorganic piece, and the particle size question separately in the nano and non-nano guide.

There’s one more limit worth knowing, because it’s the only place the regulation talks about how much. A note under the same table says that where a listed ingredient is used below 0.5% to keep a product from discolouring, that doesn’t make it a sunscreen product.^[1] So the rule turns on concentration and on why the ingredient is there. A Korean ingredient list prints neither of those. It gives you a name and a position, which is why an entry that writes Zinc Oxide (Ci 77947) can’t tell you on its own which job the zinc is doing, and why I’ve reported positions rather than converting them into amounts.

What this roundup can’t tell you is how any of these feel or look on your face. I haven’t worn them, and an ingredient list doesn’t carry that. Cast is the trade that comes up with mineral formulas, and our no white cast guide takes it apart across filter types. If you want the filter families laid out one by one, our filter guide names them, and if you’re shopping for a child rather than yourself, the kids and babies guide has its own mineral picks and its own reasoning.

FAQ

How do I tell if the Korean sunscreen I own is really mineral?

Read the ingredient list and look for zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. Those are the only two minerals Korea permits as UV filters, out of 32 permitted filter ingredients in total. If either or both are there and nothing else from that list is, it’s mineral. If a carbon-based filter is in there too, you have a hybrid, which is a real and common category rather than a failed mineral.

Why does my sunscreen’s database page list an extract under Sunscreen?

Because the database prints CosIng function records, and CosIng records Buddleja Officinalis Flower Extract with the function “uv filter”. That’s a description of a claimed function, not a Korean approval, and Buddleja is not on Korea’s list of 32. On four of the seven Dr.G entries we opened, counting it would turn one filter into two, and on a fifth it would turn none into one. Count only what’s on the regulator’s list and the number stops moving.

Should I worry if zinc oxide appears twice on the same list?

No, that’s a transcription artefact. One Isntree entry prints zinc oxide at position 33 and again at 38, and prints a silicone twice as well, which tells you the page was typed up with a repeat rather than that the formula doubled anything. It also means a raw count of that page runs long. Compare against another entry for the same product before you treat any single count as the truth.

Am I giving anything up by choosing a mineral formula?

Mostly finish rather than protection. Both minerals are capped at the same 25% as each other under Korean rules, so nothing about being mineral makes a formula weaker or stronger on paper. What changes is how it looks and feels, since zinc can leave a cast, and how many different filters you’re exposed to, which is fewer. The American Academy of Dermatology’s answer names one group and one group only: “Dermatologists recommend physical sunscreens, also called mineral sunscreens, for people with sensitive skin.” The same answer then says any of these sunscreens protects you effectively if you pick one that is broad spectrum, water resistant and SPF 30 or higher. So it’s a fit for a named group rather than a general upgrade.

Can I trust a mineral claim if I only check one database page?

Not reliably, and that’s the practical finding here. Six products needed 21 pages between them. Benton has two creams with near-identical titles and different filters, Round Lab has a mineral and a carbon-filter sunscreen one word apart, Klairs has the same split, and Dr.G’s seven entries answer differently from each other. Open every entry that names your product, and match the ingredient count on your own box before you believe any of them.

Sources

Korean regulation, read from the ministry’s own published text of the notice:
[1] 「화장품 안전기준 등에 관한 규정」, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety Notice No. 2026-19, issued 2026-03-18, which is the current consolidated text on the ministry’s own notice board as of 2026-07-29. Article 2 sets the scope as all cosmetics manufactured, imported or distributed in Korea. Article 4 states that ingredients requiring use restrictions and their conditions are set out in Annex 2, and that preservatives, UV filters and the like outside Annex 2 may not be used. The Annex 2 table headed 자외선 차단성분 runs across pages 107 to 109 of the notice and lists 32 ingredient names, counted by hand on 2026-07-29 from the table rows in the HWPX version of the notice rather than from the PDF, and they fall 13, 15 and 4 across those three pages. One entry, 4-메칠벤질리덴캠퍼, prints an extra line carrying only its second CAS number and isomer name; that line belongs to the same entry and is not a thirty-third ingredient. Two of the 32 are inorganic, 징크옥사이드 (zinc oxide) at 25% and 티타늄디옥사이드 (titanium dioxide) at 25%. Also on the table and quoted elsewhere in this article: 4-메칠벤질리덴캠퍼 (4-methylbenzylidene camphor) at 4%, 호모살레이트 (homosalate) at 10%, 에칠헥실살리실레이트 (ethylhexyl salicylate) at 5%. Note 2 under the table reads, in translation, that where the concentration used is below 0.5% for the purpose of preventing discolouration of the product, it is not recognised as a sunscreen product. Notice page, with the HWPX and PDF attachments: link

What the ingredient database’s Sunscreen heading is actually reporting, read by eye on each ingredient page rather than by search:
[2] INCIDecoder ingredient pages, read 2026-07-29. Each reprints an “Official CosIng Information” block. Buddleja Officinalis Flower Extract: what-it-does “sunscreen”, all functions “uv filter”, no restriction entry, described as the extract of the flowers of Buddleja officinalis: link. Zinc Oxide: what-it-does “sunscreen”, all functions “bulking, cosmetic colorant, skin protecting, uv absorber, uv filter”, chemical name given as Zinc Oxide (Ci 77947), restrictions IV/144 and VI/30: link. Titanium Dioxide: what-it-does “sunscreen, colorant”, all functions “cosmetic colorant, opacifying, uv absorber, uv filter”, chemical name given as Titanium Dioxide (Ci 77891), restrictions IV 143, VI 27, VI 27a (nano): link

The picks. Every listing whose title names the product, pooled from five or six searches each, fetched as raw HTML with character references decoded before anything was read, and counted one ingredient per row of the page’s own table:
[3] AESTURA Derma UV365 Barrier Hydro Mineral Sunscreen. Two listings, 26 ingredients each, Zinc Oxide at position 2 on both and no other ingredient from Korea’s list. Both carry alcohol-free and fragrance and essential oil free tags. Listings read: first, second. Left out: a third entry titled only “Aestura Sunscreen”, 26 ingredients, Zinc Oxide at 2, which never prints Derma UV365 or Hydro Mineral on its page, link; and the Red Calming Tone-Up, a different product at 41 ingredients filing six ingredients under Sunscreen, Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate 4, Homosalate 5, Ethylhexyl Salicylate 6, Titanium Dioxide 9, Bisethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine 11 and Polysilicone-15 12, link
[4] Isntree Hyaluronic Acid Natural Sun Cream. Four listings at 25, 26, 30 and 39 ingredients, zinc oxide the only ingredient from Korea’s list on each. Positions: 1, 2, 2, and 33 and 38. The third is filed under the misspelled brand “Instree” and writes the filter as Zinc Oxide (Nano); it is counted here because a misspelling of the maker’s own name is not a reseller listing. The fourth is labelled a 2025 renewal and repeats two entries, Zinc Oxide at 33 and 38 and Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone at 22 and 32. All four carry both tags. Listings read: 25, 26, 30, Instree, 39, 2025 renewal
[5] Benton Skin Fit Mineral Sun Cream, and the two Benton products it is confused with. The pick has two listings at 35 ingredients each, Zinc Oxide at 2 on both, alcohol-free tag on both and no fragrance-free tag on either; the first eight positions are identical. One of the two is titled “Benton Mineral Sun Cream SPF 50+ Pa++++”, dropping Skin Fit from the title its own address keeps. Listings read: 35, title without Skin Fit, 35, title with Skin Fit. Left out as separate products: Benton Mineral Sun Cream, 38 ingredients, Zinc Oxide 3 and Titanium Dioxide 4, link; and Benton Mineral Sun Stick, two listings at 39 ingredients, one filing Titanium Dioxide at 6 alone and the other filing Titanium Dioxide at 5 with 4-Methylbenzylidene Camphor at 37, first, second
[6] Dr.G Green Mild Up Sun+. Pooled searches return thirteen Green Mild Up entries; seven name this sunscreen, at 28, 32, 36, 36, 40, 52 and 53 ingredients. Five file Zinc Oxide and Buddleja Officinalis Flower Extract under Sunscreen, at Zinc Oxide 3 and Buddleja 26 for the 28-item entry, Zinc Oxide 2 and Buddleja 33 for both 36-item entries, and Zinc Oxide 2 and Buddleja 39 for the 40. One, the 32-item entry, files Buddleja at 29 and has no zinc oxide row. Two, at 52 and 53, file Zinc Oxide 3 with Titanium Dioxide 5, the second of those written as Titanium Dioxide (Ci77891); those two are also the only ones without a fragrance-free tag and the only ones carrying an ingredient with alcohol in its name, Cetearyl Alcohol at 35 and 36. No entry carries a carbon-based filter. Listings read: 28, 32, 36, 36 second, 40, 52, 53. Left out as separate products in the same line: the Sun Stick at 43 twice, a and b; the Sun Essence at 54, which files five carbon-based filters plus Buddleja, link; two lotions at 29 and 36, a and b; and a Green Mild Up Defense Mineral Sunscreen at 43, link
[7] ROUND LAB Birch Juice Moisturizing Mild-up Sun Cream. Four listings at 35, 35, 35 and 32 ingredients, Zinc Oxide at position 2 on all four, alcohol-free tag on all four. One query for the birch line returns one of these; a second phrasing returns all four. The 32-item entry is the export title, “Birch Mild-up Sunscreen Uvlock SPF 50+ Broad Spectrum”. Listings read: 35, Sun Cream, 35, Sunscreen, 35, no Juice in title, 32, export. Left out as a separate product: Birch Juice Moisturizing Sunscreen, three listings at 35, 40 and 35 ingredients with no zinc oxide or titanium dioxide on any of them, 35, 40, 35 second
[8] Goodal Heartleaf Calming Mineral Filter Sun Cream. Two listings carrying the identical title, at 57 and 41 ingredients, Zinc Oxide at position 2 and position 1 respectively and no other ingredient from Korea’s list on either. Both carry the alcohol-free tag and neither carries a fragrance-free tag. Listings read: 57, 41

Dermatology guidance, read on the page the old sunscreen FAQ address now redirects to:
[11] Sunscreen FAQs, American Academy of Dermatology, read 2026-07-29. The address aad.org/public/everyday-care/sun-protection/shade-clothing-sunscreen/sunscreen-faqs returns a 302 to aad.org/media/stats-sunscreen, which is the page quoted here. Under “What is the difference between chemical and physical sunscreens?” it reads: “If the active ingredient in your sunscreen is titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, or both, you have a physical sunscreen. Dermatologists recommend physical sunscreens, also called mineral sunscreens, for people with sensitive skin. If your sunscreen doesn’t contain titanium dioxide or zinc oxide, you have a chemical sunscreen.” The same answer continues: “Whether you have a chemical, physical, or hybrid sunscreen, they all form a protective layer on your skin that absorbs the sun’s rays,” that physical sunscreens also reflect them, and that “any of these sunscreens can effectively protect you from the sun if you select one that is broad spectrum, water resistant, and has an SPF 30 or higher.” Under “What type of sunscreen should I use?”: “The best type of sunscreen is the one you will use again and again.” link

Products named in the article but not picked:
[9] Klairs, two sunscreens one word apart. All-day Airy Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++, 33 ingredients, Zinc Oxide (Ci 77947) at position 2 and nothing else from Korea’s list, both tags: link. All Day Airy Sunscreen SPF 50+, 44 ingredients, four carbon-based filters at positions 4, 5, 7 and 8 and neither mineral anywhere on the list, both tags: link
[10] Passed the ingredient test, no live single-unit retail page found on 2026-07-29, so not picked. Illiyoon Mineral Sun Cream SPF 50+, 35 ingredients, Zinc Oxide 3 and Titanium Dioxide 6, alcohol-free tag: link. Etude House Sunprise Mild Airy Finish, two listings at 34 ingredients each with Zinc Oxide at 2, the 2022 entry writing it as Zinc Oxide (Nano): 2023, 2022. A third entry under that name, Sunprise Mild Airy Finish Sun Milk at 49 ingredients, is a separate product and lists Alcohol at position 4: link

Topics: AESTURA · Alcohol-Free · Dr.G · Fragrance-Free · Heartleaf (Houttuynia) · Hybrid Filters · Ingredient Lists · Isntree · Klairs · Mineral Sunscreen · PA / UVA Rating · Round Lab · Sensitive Skin · Water Resistant · All topics